Judges
Judicial candidates should demonstrate competence, integrity, independence, impartiality, sound judgment and commitment to justice.
This page records the proposed independence and eligibility framework for people seeking to serve the Court. The specific rules should be formally adopted through the Treaty, Court Rules or other lawful founding instruments before appointments are made.
The Treaty provides for judges, prosecutors and prosecution personnel, investigators, Court Enforcement Officers and other Court officials, employees, contractors and specialist personnel. Article 51 also provides for competency-based routes where knowledge and skills can be objectively demonstrated.
Judicial candidates should demonstrate competence, integrity, independence, impartiality, sound judgment and commitment to justice.
The independent Office of the Prosecutor may include the Prosecutor, deputies, assistants, legal officers and other necessary personnel.
Investigative personnel may gather evidence and include legal, forensic, financial, digital and analytical specialists, subject to independence and professional standards.
The Court Enforcement Service may include enforcement officers, investigators, transport, forensic, financial, safeguarding and technical personnel.
For Court service, the proposed rule is that a person must not hold any of the following positions while serving, and must complete a two-year cooling-off period after leaving such a position:
Ordinary political-party membership is not included in this proposed exclusion. The two-year period is intended to protect institutional independence and avoid immediate movement from political or governmental authority into Court service.
This page describes the proposed policy requested for the Court website. It should not be presented as an already-enacted Treaty amendment unless and until the relevant founding authority formally adopts it.